Orthodontic microscrews, also known as temporary anchorage devices (TADs), have revolutionized orthodontic treatments by providing reliable skeletal anchorage.
Despite their widespread use, failures can occur, influenced by various factors. Understanding these factors is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes.
Key Factors Influencing Microscrew Failure
1. Patient-Related Factors
✔ Oral Hygiene and Inflammation
Poor oral hygiene can lead to peri-implant inflammation, a significant contributor to microscrew failure. Maintaining optimal oral hygiene is essential to prevent such complications.
✔ Bone Quality and Density
The success rate of microscrews is higher in areas with good bone quality. Studies indicate that implants in denser bone regions have a success rate of up to 95.8%, compared to 23.1% in less dense areas.
✔ Age and Gender
Younger patients may experience higher failure rates due to ongoing bone development. Additionally, some studies suggest that females have a higher success rate (85.9%) compared to males (69.5%).
► DENTAL BOOK: Orthodontics - Diagnosis and Management of Malocclusion and Dentofacial Deformities - Om Prakash Kharbanda
2. Implant-Related Factors
✔ Material and Corrosion
While titanium is commonly used for microscrews, corrosion can occur, leading to inflammation and potential failure. The release of metal ions due to corrosion is a concern that needs addressing.
✔ Design and Dimensions
The diameter and length of the microscrew can influence its stability. However, studies have shown that these factors alone do not significantly impact success rates.
3. Operator-Related Factors
✔ Insertion Technique
Proper surgical technique is vital. Inadequate insertion methods can compromise the stability of the microscrew, leading to failure.
✔ Placement Site
Choosing the appropriate site for insertion is crucial. For instance, palatal placements often provide better stability compared to buccal sites.
Conclusion
Microscrew failure in orthodontics is multifactorial, involving patient-specific factors, implant characteristics, and clinical techniques.
A comprehensive understanding and careful consideration of these factors can significantly reduce failure rates and enhance treatment efficacy.
References
